|
|
IRAN
AND THE WORLD IN THE SAFAVID AGE
Abstracts
Newman, Dr. Andrew,
Edinburgh University, Department of Islamic and Middle Eastern
Studies, Edinburgh, Arab 'Doctors', Iranian 'Notables' and the 'Revival'
of Akhbari Shi'ism in Safavid Iran
The present paper
provides an opportunity for reassessing our 1993 suggestion as to
the limited extent of the influx of Arab Shi'i clerics into
Safavid territory following the establishment of Twelver Shi'ism
in Iran following the capture of Tabriz in 907/1501 by Shah
Isma'il.
The paper assesses the
'debate' generated by our 1993 article on the subject and then
considers the development of relations between those Arab clerics
who did relocate to Iran over this period and the native Iranian
clerical class. It
has been suggested that these incoming Arab clerics clashed with
the established native-Iranian 'clerical notables' or the
'clerical estate', most of whom only 'formally' professed Shi'ism
and entered government service, mainly as 'judges and clerical
administrators' and were, in the seventeenth century, the
principle beneficiaries, if not also the chief supporters, of the
Akhbari 'revival'. Others,
in the aftermath of the 1993 article, have suggested both that
large numbers of Arab, and especially Lebanese scholars, entered
Iran in the late-sixteenth and especially the seventeenth-century
and that Lebanese scholars drawn from the Jabal Amil region in
particular occupied the key positions within the Safavid state.
It will be suggested that
it remains true that, during the first half-century following the
capture of Tabriz, very few Arab clerics migrated to Iran with the
express purpose of contributing to the propagation of the faith
within Safavid territory. Nevertheless,
beginning early on with Ali al-Karaki (d. 940/1534), a confluence
of both spiritual and material interests rapidly obtained between
those clerics who did enter Iran to participate in the Safavid
'project' and the Tajik clerical class, especially including
Iranian Sayyids. Too,
the handful of Amili clerics who can be identified as having come
to Iran over the period never occupied more than a very limited
number of posts over the two hundred years of the Safavid period.
By contrast, large numbers of native Iranian clerics,
including many Sayyids, occupied key 'national' and 'local' posts
or otherwise important informal positions at both levels over the
period. Moreover,
there seems very little evidence of any Akhbari sympathies among
the native Iranian clerical 'estate'; indeed, the holding of
discretely Akhbari sympathies by such clerics would have been
antithetical to their own material interests over the period.
Indeed, and finally, the seventeenth century, as the
sixteenth, is distinguished as a period of overall co-operation
between Arab and Tajik clerics on both the key 'problematic' and
less controversial issues of the day.
Back to Abstracts
Directory
Back
to Programme
|
|